A register that matches
Location, status and the responsible unit are on the asset.
Public assets, facility alarms and duty records in one reviewable flow.
Asset, alarm and duty action stay on one reviewable record. The display wall reads that same record.
The asset register lags the site
Alarms arrive and nobody owns them
Handover is a notebook, written up later
The wall screen and the register disagree
Keep the equipment you have, connect the data first, then split the views by role. The connection layer takes the most work, and it is where most of our effort goes.
PLCs, meters, access control, cameras and sensors already on site. Read what is readable, add a module where it is not, and leave the existing control system alone.
Modbus · OPC UA · MQTT · HTTP · GB28181 · SDK
Common protocols connect directly. The gateway handles protocol mapping, local buffering and backfill, so the data does not break.
Device registry, time-series data, alert rules, work orders, roles and audit in one back end that serves several scenarios.
Data is collected once and reused by every scenario added later, which is why the connection layer has to be done properly the first time.
Location, status and the responsible unit are on the asset.
Unclaimed alarms stay on the list.
Handover and action are written on the event at the time.
The display reads the register and the alarms, not a second spreadsheet.
Not a feature list: what actually happens in a day. These four steps are the common shape of such projects.
Bookings tie to access, and rooms release 15 minutes after a no-show.
Temperature drifts; the duty phone gets a notice that names the rack.
The fix enters the room log, and the monthly report rolls up on its own.
Every stage has a checkable output. No six-month build followed by a single review.
Walk the site, list devices, available ports and current systems, and mark what reads directly versus what needs a module.
Rank the ideas by impact, feasibility and dependencies, then choose one that proves value without dragging in every department.
Gateways connect devices, data lands on the platform, and alert rules, roles and recipients are configured for a small internal group.
One team or one building uses it for real; rules and screens change with feedback until false and missed alarms settle.
Check every acceptance item, finish documentation and training, then decide which buildings, lines or sites come next.
The three items below come from projects of this kind and go into the acceptance sheet, instead of relying on a general impression.
The register is closer to the site
Alarms have an owner
Reports do not need a second spreadsheet
The asset register lags the site Alarms arrive and nobody owns them Handover is a notebook, written up later The wall screen and the register disagree
A register that matches: Location, status and the responsible unit are on the asset. Alarms need an owner: Unclaimed alarms stay on the list. Duty on the event: Handover and action are written on the event at the time. Wall uses the same numbers: The display reads the register and the alarms, not a second spreadsheet.
The register is closer to the site Alarms have an owner Reports do not need a second spreadsheet
No. The platform reads through interfaces or gateways and the existing systems stay in use. Only modules nobody maintains are worth replacing.
Priced by scenarios and device connection points: a site survey produces the list, then a quote and schedule. Most projects have a first scenario live in four to eight weeks.
Leave one contact. We send how similar projects were handled plus a scenario list. If it is not worth doing, we say so.
Phones are answered 9:00-18:00 on weekdays, or scan the WeChat code.