Asset, alarm and duty action stay on one reviewable record. The display wall reads that same record.

Pain Points

  1. 01

    The asset register lags the site

  2. 02

    Alarms arrive and nobody owns them

  3. 03

    Handover is a notebook, written up later

  4. 04

    The wall screen and the register disagree

How the system is put together

Keep the equipment you have, connect the data first, then split the views by role. The connection layer takes the most work, and it is where most of our effort goes.

L1

Devices

  • Video conferencing
  • Access
  • Energy
  • Server room
  • Display walls

PLCs, meters, access control, cameras and sensors already on site. Read what is readable, add a module where it is not, and leave the existing control system alone.

L2

Connection

Modbus · OPC UA · MQTT · HTTP · GB28181 · SDK

Common protocols connect directly. The gateway handles protocol mapping, local buffering and backfill, so the data does not break.

L3

Platform

  • Device registry
  • Time-series data
  • Alert rules
  • Work orders
  • Roles and audit

Device registry, time-series data, alert rules, work orders, roles and audit in one back end that serves several scenarios.

L4

Applications

  • Asset inventory
  • Alert claiming
  • Duty log
  • One dashboard dataset
  • Manager view
  • Phone actions on site
  • Narrow external lookup

Data is collected once and reused by every scenario added later, which is why the connection layer has to be done properly the first time.

What we deliver

01

A register that matches

Location, status and the responsible unit are on the asset.

02

Alarms need an owner

Unclaimed alarms stay on the list.

03

Duty on the event

Handover and action are written on the event at the time.

04

Wall uses the same numbers

The display reads the register and the alarms, not a second spreadsheet.

Where it fits

  • Agency facilities
  • Public-asset operations
  • Duty watch
  • Status wall

What a real day looks like

Not a feature list: what actually happens in a day. These four steps are the common shape of such projects.

  1. 09:30 Meeting rooms

    Bookings tie to access, and rooms release 15 minutes after a no-show.

  2. 14:00 Server room

    Temperature drifts; the duty phone gets a notice that names the rack.

  3. Same day

    The fix enters the room log, and the monthly report rolls up on its own.

Delivery rhythm

Every stage has a checkable output. No six-month build followed by a single review.

  1. Week 1

    Site survey

    Walk the site, list devices, available ports and current systems, and mark what reads directly versus what needs a module.

  2. Week 2

    Pick the first scenario

    Rank the ideas by impact, feasibility and dependencies, then choose one that proves value without dragging in every department.

  3. Weeks 3-5

    Connect and wire up

    Gateways connect devices, data lands on the platform, and alert rules, roles and recipients are configured for a small internal group.

  4. Weeks 5-7

    Pilot

    One team or one building uses it for real; rules and screens change with feedback until false and missed alarms settle.

  5. Week 8

    Accept and repeat

    Check every acceptance item, finish documentation and training, then decide which buildings, lines or sites come next.

Acceptance is these three lines

The three items below come from projects of this kind and go into the acceptance sheet, instead of relying on a general impression.

  • task_alt

    The register is closer to the site

  • task_alt

    Alarms have an owner

  • task_alt

    Reports do not need a second spreadsheet

Questions

Where does this industry get stuck?

The asset register lags the site Alarms arrive and nobody owns them Handover is a notebook, written up later The wall screen and the register disagree

What does Yifu do here?

A register that matches: Location, status and the responsible unit are on the asset. Alarms need an owner: Unclaimed alarms stay on the list. Duty on the event: Handover and action are written on the event at the time. Wall uses the same numbers: The display reads the register and the alarms, not a second spreadsheet.

What changes after it is in place?

The register is closer to the site Alarms have an owner Reports do not need a second spreadsheet

Do we have to replace our current systems?

No. The platform reads through interfaces or gateways and the existing systems stay in use. Only modules nobody maintains are worth replacing.

What does it cost, and how soon is it live?

Priced by scenarios and device connection points: a site survey produces the list, then a quote and schedule. Most projects have a first scenario live in four to eight weeks.

Free diagnosis

Tell us where it gets stuck

Leave one contact. We send how similar projects were handled plus a scenario list. If it is not worth doing, we say so.

  • checkA 30-minute call to judge whether it is worth doing
  • checkA workable scenario list and timeline
  • checkNo consulting fee up front

No spam, and we never share your details with third parties.

Get Industry-specific Solution

Phones are answered 9:00-18:00 on weekdays, or scan the WeChat code.