Park overview
Online devices, energy and security alarms share one page.
Devices, energy, security and property on one park view.
Access, energy and property stay as they are. Operators get one view of the park, down to a building, and can match it to a 3D scene.
Access, energy, video and property each require a login
A park status update means stitching several reports
An alarm does not say which building and which asset
The 3D model is not tied to live data
Keep the equipment you have, connect the data first, then split the views by role. The connection layer takes the most work, and it is where most of our effort goes.
PLCs, meters, access control, cameras and sensors already on site. Read what is readable, add a module where it is not, and leave the existing control system alone.
Modbus · OPC UA · MQTT · HTTP · GB28181 · SDK
Common protocols connect directly. The gateway handles protocol mapping, local buffering and backfill, so the data does not break.
Device registry, time-series data, alert rules, work orders, roles and audit in one back end that serves several scenarios.
Data is collected once and reused by every scenario added later, which is why the connection layer has to be done properly the first time.
Online devices, energy and security alarms share one page.
Park, building and asset are the same data set.
An alarm names the place and the asset.
The 3D scene shows where; the numbers still come from meters and monitors.
Not a feature list: what actually happens in a day. These four steps are the common shape of such projects.
A tenant reports low water pressure in the workshop; the ticket goes to park engineering.
The pump room pressure curve pulls into the ticket and shows the VFD running slow.
Pressure recovers, the ticket attaches to the pump file, and the quarterly service picks it up.
Every stage has a checkable output. No six-month build followed by a single review.
Walk the site, list devices, available ports and current systems, and mark what reads directly versus what needs a module.
Rank the ideas by impact, feasibility and dependencies, then choose one that proves value without dragging in every department.
Gateways connect devices, data lands on the platform, and alert rules, roles and recipients are configured for a small internal group.
One team or one building uses it for real; rules and screens change with feedback until false and missed alarms settle.
Check every acceptance item, finish documentation and training, then decide which buildings, lines or sites come next.
The three items below come from projects of this kind and go into the acceptance sheet, instead of relying on a general impression.
Park status does not need a stitched report
Alarms name the building and asset
The 3D scene matches live status
Access, parking and tickets lived in separate tools; one view for status and work orders cuts paper and chat ops.
Access and parking status in one view
Learn More →EnergyCampus utilities were opaque and waste found late; unified metering and boards locate peak periods and circuits.
Usage split by area; waste easier to find
Learn More →CampusCampus assets and energy need a 3D map tied to the site; twin views map devices and alerts for duty and emergency.
Campus assets in one ops view
Learn More →Access, energy, video and property each require a login A park status update means stitching several reports An alarm does not say which building and which asset The 3D model is not tied to live data
Park overview: Online devices, energy and security alarms share one page. Down to the building: Park, building and asset are the same data set. Located alarms: An alarm names the place and the asset. Twin as a map: The 3D scene shows where; the numbers still come from meters and monitors.
Park status does not need a stitched report Alarms name the building and asset The 3D scene matches live status
No. The platform reads through interfaces or gateways and the existing systems stay in use. Only modules nobody maintains are worth replacing.
Priced by scenarios and device connection points: a site survey produces the list, then a quote and schedule. Most projects have a first scenario live in four to eight weeks.
Leave one contact. We send how similar projects were handled plus a scenario list. If it is not worth doing, we say so.
Phones are answered 9:00-18:00 on weekdays, or scan the WeChat code.